Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 5:24:04 GMT
Regulation art. 10/1) In that case, the General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs should be asked and determined whether the plaintiff is registered in the "foreigners registry" and whether there is any information about the residence address in Turkey as of the date of the case in the same registry, and the persons' address declaration should be determined. It should also be taken into consideration that the notifications in the form will be valid until proven otherwise (Regulation Art. 13/1), and this and all the evidence presented by the parties should be evaluated together and a decision should be made according to the result.
From the evidence collected, it can be seen that the France Telegram Number Data husband and wife are German nationals and did not transfer their residence to Turkey, but lived in Kemer continuously from 1988 to 1991, and then the plaintiff went to Germany for 2-3 months and never visited Kemer in the last year. It is understood. It is clear that the residence of the husband and wife is not Kemer. (Regulation art. 10/1) In that case, the General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs should be asked and determined whether the plaintiff is registered in the "foreigners registry" and whether there is any information about the residence address in Turkey as of the date of the case in the same registry, and the persons' address declaration should be determined.
It should also be taken into consideration that the notifications in the form will be valid until proven otherwise (Regulation Art. 13/1), and this and all the evidence presented by the parties should be evaluated together and a decision should be made according to the result. (Supreme Court 2nd HD. 10.05.2011, 2010/4537 E., 2011/8105 K.) From the evidence collected, it can be seen that the husband and wife are German nationals and did not transfer their residence to Turkey, but lived in Kemer continuously from 1988 to 1991, and then the plaintiff went to Germany for 2-3 months and never visited Kemer in the last year. It is understood. It is clear that the residence of the husband and wife is not Kemer.
From the evidence collected, it can be seen that the France Telegram Number Data husband and wife are German nationals and did not transfer their residence to Turkey, but lived in Kemer continuously from 1988 to 1991, and then the plaintiff went to Germany for 2-3 months and never visited Kemer in the last year. It is understood. It is clear that the residence of the husband and wife is not Kemer. (Regulation art. 10/1) In that case, the General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs should be asked and determined whether the plaintiff is registered in the "foreigners registry" and whether there is any information about the residence address in Turkey as of the date of the case in the same registry, and the persons' address declaration should be determined.
It should also be taken into consideration that the notifications in the form will be valid until proven otherwise (Regulation Art. 13/1), and this and all the evidence presented by the parties should be evaluated together and a decision should be made according to the result. (Supreme Court 2nd HD. 10.05.2011, 2010/4537 E., 2011/8105 K.) From the evidence collected, it can be seen that the husband and wife are German nationals and did not transfer their residence to Turkey, but lived in Kemer continuously from 1988 to 1991, and then the plaintiff went to Germany for 2-3 months and never visited Kemer in the last year. It is understood. It is clear that the residence of the husband and wife is not Kemer.